Our litigation team represents clients across a wide range of disputes, including contract issues, business conflicts, and more. We provide strategic advocacy, guiding clients through each stage of the litigation process.
We understand that litigation carries the risk of significant costs for all parties – it can strain budgets, stress emotions, and absorb valuable time. Whether you are the plaintiff or the defendant, we will assess the strength of your case so that together we can create and execute a strategy that will secure for you the best possible outcome while minimizing the risks and costs to you and your business.
With years of litigation experience at some of the nation’s most prestigious law firms, our attorneys have the depth of knowledge necessary to guide clients through complex, high-stakes cases to a successful resolution.
Our firm has a proven track record of success in general litigation, resolving complex disputes across various industries. The cases featured here reflect our dedication to strategic advocacy and delivering the best outcomes for our clients. Click the link for more details.
1:23-cv-04880-JPO - Sept 20, 2024
Levin-Epstein & Associates, P.C. is pleased to share a recent favorable decision, obtained on behalf of Chinese investors, who are class Plaintiffs, that placed their investment funds of $48.4 million ($550,000 from each Plaintiff) into escrow accounts with TD Bank. The Court denied the TD Bank’s Motion to Dismiss.
22cv07332-AT - June 6, 2023
The firm obtained a favorable Court order authorizing alternative means of service by Whatsapp pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e).
20cv8228 - May 9, 2022
The firm obtained a consensual judgment in favor of our client, a publicly traded company, following two years of litigation when the Honorable Senior Judge Jed Rakoff denied our adversaries’ motion to dismiss fraud and veil piercing claims against the individual owner of a company that contracted with our client.
Case Two
The firm obtained a favorable decision against a national bank as the Honorable Justice Joseph Risi of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Queens County, denied the defendant-bank’s motion to dismiss our client’s cause of action for conversion for the bank’s acceptance for deposit a check bearing a forged endorsement and making payment on same. Under New York’s UCC § 3-419, a bank is strictly liable for conversion when it pays on a forged endorsement subject to certain defenses it may raise.
Case One
Levin-Epstein & Associates, P.C. is pleased to share a recent favorable decision, obtained on behalf of our clients, issued by the Honorable Justice Arlene P. Bluth in Hongying Zhao, et al. v. Ardent Financial Fund, et. al. (Index No. 157066/2017). The Court granted our clients Motion to Dismiss in its entirety, with prejudice, and with costs awarded. Plaintiffs brought the following three (3) causes of action: (1) constructive trust, (2) money had and received, and (3) unjust enrichment.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
© 2022 Levin-Epstein & Associates, P.C.
