Contingency Litigation

We offer contingency litigation services for qualifying cases, meaning clients don’t pay fees unless we secure a successful outcome. Our team is invested in achieving results, aligning our success with yours.

Achieving your goals sometimes requires litigating an important case – an undertaking that might place an unacceptably large financial burden on your small or medium-size business. The risk of incurring this expense may well discourage you from pursuing a case that is important to your success and that you are eager to pursue.

Levin-Epstein & Associates, P.C. understands this difficult choice – and offers contingency fee options for certain litigation matters. In such cases, a fee is not charged for our work on your case until we have won it or reached a negotiated settlement with the other party.

A contingent fee arrangement makes it possible for a small or medium-size business to pursue claims for which they might not have the resources. Our team will work with you to tailor a contingent fee arrangement that is right for your business.

With our extensive experience, we have the flexibility and skill to manage cases that involve:

  • Class actions

  • Multiple plaintiffs

  • Strategic alliances with other law firms

We have successfully represented clients on a contingency fee basis across a wide range of disputes including:

  • Breach of Contract

  • Judgment Enforcement Actions

  • Minimum Wage Violations

  • Real Estate Transactions

  • Unpaid Overtime Actions

If you have been considering pursuing an important claim but are concerned that the suit could place too heavy a financial burden on your business, let our team help you find a fee arrangement that works for you.

More information about our Contingency Litigation practice can be found here: https://www.businesscontingencylawyer.com

Notable Contingency Litigation Cases

Our firm has achieved substantial awards and settlements for clients facing complex challenges. We’re open to discussing and exploring contingency options for cases where it’s a mutually beneficial fit.

01

Case One

On a motion to vacate an arbitral award before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the firm successfully defended its trial-victory for a wrongfully terminated executive in a breach of contract case. The New York Law Journal included the decision of the federal court upholding the trial court's decision in its "Decision of Interest" column.

See Case
Call Us
call
Locate
locate
Contact
contact