Our firm has achieved substantial awards and settlements for clients facing complex challenges. We’re open to discussing and exploring contingency options for cases where it’s a mutually beneficial fit. Below are highlights of our successful outcomes — click the link for more details.
Levin-Epstein & Associates, P.C. understands this difficult choice – and offers contingency fee options for certain litigation matters. In such cases, a fee is not charged for our work on your case until we have won it or reached a negotiated settlement with the other party.
A contingent fee arrangement makes it possible for a small or medium-size business to pursue claims for which they might not have the resources. Our team will work with you to tailor a contingent fee arrangement that is right for your business.
With our extensive experience, we have the flexibility and skill to manage cases that involve:
Class actions
Multiple plaintiffs
Strategic alliances with other law firms
We have successfully represented clients on a contingency fee basis across a wide range of disputes including:
Breach of Contract
Judgment Enforcement Actions
Minimum Wage Violations
Real Estate Transactions
Unpaid Overtime Actions
If you have been considering pursuing an important claim but are concerned that the suit could place too heavy a financial burden on your business, let our team help you find a fee arrangement that works for you.
More information about our Contingency Litigation practice can be found here: https://www.businesscontingencylawyer.com
Our firm has a proven track record of success in general litigation, resolving complex disputes across various industries. The cases featured here reflect our dedication to strategic advocacy and delivering the best outcomes for our clients. Click the link for more details.
Case One
On a motion to vacate an arbitral award before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the firm successfully defended its trial-victory for a wrongfully terminated executive in a breach of contract case. The New York Law Journal included the decision of the federal court upholding the trial court's decision in its "Decision of Interest" column.